Monday, June 17, 2019
Reading Response Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words - 2
Reading Response - Assignment ExampleSuch is a portrayal of disregard to the innate beliefs of people that require the redrafting of the legislations that predominate religion and freedom of worship in the country.Offering bodies for scientific studies is a personal decision that people make in order to foster science. However, forcing a particular group to offer their dead for scientific studies discriminative, human anatomy is similar and those compelling others should take the initiative of enhancing science by offering their throw bodies. The article calls for the review of laws that govern the remittance of bodies to museums and scientific institutions in order to grow science. The conflict between science and religion requires effective management in order to ensure that each enjoys relative space for growth. In cases where religion opposes specific scientific operations people must take special deliberations including change of existing laws in order to limit the extent of t he conflicts. Science offers practical answers and solutions to the social problems while religion offers spiritual answers. Both are effective in their own way. The article therefore discusses the contention that arises when religion and science conflict. Offering human bodies for scientific studies remains contentious to most societies. In the United States, the arguments that American Indians should offer their ancestors bodies for scientific studies are rising amid opposition from different quarters.I agree with the ideas in the article. Religion is an instrumental cultural component that influences the lifestyles of people. Religion influences the religion of an individual thus influencing their values. As such, religion remains an important aspect of life. The values and beliefs of people are intricate aspect of their lives that the society should respect and value. This underscores the urgency for changing the antiques act of 1906 and the archeological resource protection a ct of 1979 both of which stipulated
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.